Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys"
Results 181 - 200
of 746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2019, 1:02 pm
In Humphrey v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
We opted not to include Myers and Humphrey's Executor; Morrison covers those issues well. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court later held that the Tenure Act as unconstitutional in Myers v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:14 am
In the latest bad faith case, Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm
However, the Ninth Circuit went on to conclude that the Supreme Court’s separation-of- powers decisions, in particular Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:23 am
Cameron Malone-BrownOn 16 October 2019, the long-awaited opinion of Advocate General Tanchev was handed down in the case of Sky Plc & Ots v SkyKick UK Ltd & Anr (Case C-371/18). [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am
That sturdy precedent was the Court’s decision in the case of Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:09 am
Humphrey dismissals without prejudice are strikes under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am
Therefore the TTAB was correct in granting the petition of competitor Ambev S.A. to cancel the mark due to abandonment (Cervejaria Petropolis SA v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
Humphrey, which bars civil suits about convictions that have not been reversed, expunged or declared invalid, count as “strikes” under the PLRA. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
The defendant invoked the judgment of the EU General Court in Micro Leader v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:30 pm
Young v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:44 am
The appellate court reversed a district court’s denial of the German company’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and remanded with instructions that the case be dismissed (C5 Medical Werks, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 6:58 am
Young v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:34 am
Consequently, the appellate court remanded the case to the trial court to allow it to reconsider this award (4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:41 am
BIMBO v NATEXO Conversely, in a very similar case the Barcelona Court of Appeal (Decision No. 423/2018), held that trademark infringement had indeed taken place. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
FNU Tanzin v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:57 pm
., SpA v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:17 am
The court also affirmed a district judge’s order sanctioning L&L for failing to disclose its third-party license agreement in discovery (Beach Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
