Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys"
Results 201 - 220
of 746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2019, 2:26 am
[1] (Iancu v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:53 pm
Humphreys v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:07 am
Young v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
Its existence was conjectured by the Russian mathematician Vladimir Arnold in 1995 and proven by the Hungarian scientists Gábor Domokos and Péter Várkonyi in 2006. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 3:41 am
This was clarified in L’ Oreal SA v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:06 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Bodum USA Incorporated v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:01 am
The appellate court affirmed the lower court’s summary judgment order dismissing all of the corporation’s claims arising out of what the corporation contended was political retribution exacted by the mayor against it (Comite Fiestas De La Calle San Sebastian, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court held in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 6:50 am
“No example of a barter economy, pure and simple, has ever been described, let alone the emergence from it of money,” wrote the Cambridge anthropology professor Caroline Humphrey in a 1985 paper. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am
In addition, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying ACT’s request for a permanent injunction because ACT failed to establish that it would sustain irreparable harm (ACT 898 Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 6:55 am
The Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that there was no indication that the award was procured through fraud or dishonesty, or that any other basis for overturning the award existed (Landau v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 1:40 pm
Virginia CervieriThe Uruguayan Criminal Court of First Instance Specialized in Organized Crime has ordered internet service providers (ISPs) to block websites that retransmit sporting events illegally, thereby infringing the copyright to this content (Fox International Channels v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
Nixon doubled down on the Southern Strategy during the general election, capturing six southern states compared to one for Democrat Hubert Humphrey. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:21 am
. *********** [1] Tea Board, India v ITC Limited, (C.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm
In Iancu v Brunetti, the USPTO argues for the permanence of the “immoral or scandalous” provision. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
The court refers to the CJEU case C 251/95 SABEL BV v Puma AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport, 11 November 1997 to hold that the mere association which the public might make between two trademarks as a result of their analogous semantic content is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that there is a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
