Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys" Results 241 - 260 of 650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2010, 6:44 am by Gerard Magliocca
 To take a simple example, Brown v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of alleged misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [see, for example, Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_06924.htm_________________The Discipline Book, - A 458 page guide to disciplinary actions involving public officers and employees. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am by Brianne Gorod
Second, in a 1935 Supreme Court case called Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:10 am
Further, case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231]. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
At the time, Vice President Humphrey’s campaign was quickly gaining ground against Nixon’s lead. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sullivan, 658 F.2d 93, 96 n.4 (3d Cir. 1983) (en banc); Humphreys v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:20 am by Amy Howe
The 9th Circuit pointed to a 1935 Supreme Court decision called Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm by admin
In Humphrey v Sears Roebuck, for example, employee Kathleen Humphrey injured her foot while moving stock. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
As Meredith pointed out in her recent blog on the Executive Order, the SCOTUS held in a New Deal Era case called Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]