Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys" Results 241 - 260 of 734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
And Humphreys busied himself ordering multiple people arrested people for failing to swear allegiance to the Confederate States of America. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 10:48 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court therefore affirmed, finding that the trial properly sustained the plaintiffs’ administrative appeal. 347 Humphrey Street, LLC v Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of New Haven, 2015 WL 5687733 (CT App. 10/6/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 1:04 am by Marilynn Helt
The Federal Circuit reversed the ITC’s determination that Laerdal failed to plead its trade dress claims with adequate detail, vacated the ITC’s decision that no relief was warranted, and remanded to the ITC to determine the appropriate remedy after consideration of public interest concerns (Laerdal Medical Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Pamela C. Maloney
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a summary order affirming the district court’s judgment (Oneida Indian Nation v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:50 am by Matt Pavich
The district court was instructed on remand to determine whether the retailer consented to the publication (Sleepy’s LLC v. [read post]
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 12:11 am by Joseph Arshawsky
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit found that all of Engage’s asserted marks were merely descriptive and lacked secondary meaning, including sole only mark the district court deemed valid mark but not infringed by Intellisphere (Engage Healthcare Communications, LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:00 am by Assen Alexiev
The court remanded trademark infringement and other claims brought by dietary supplement seller Charles Curry to the federal district court in Chicago for further proceedings (Curry v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:44 am by Thomas Long
The appellate court reversed a district court’s denial of the German company’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and remanded with instructions that the case be dismissed (C5 Medical Werks, LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:12 am by Deirdre Kennedy
Not only did appellee’s arguments have virtually no likelihood of success because the seller had waived them, but its actions in bringing the appeal were found to be a tactic to draw out the proceedings as long as possible while knowing that it had no viable substantive defense (Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
” “‘Rick [Humphrey Bogart]: “My health. [read post]