Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys" Results 261 - 280 of 760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of alleged misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [see, for example, Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_06924.htm_________________The Discipline Book, - A 458 page guide to disciplinary actions involving public officers and employees. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
Considering the director’s insulation from removal by the President, Judge Pillard looked to Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:44 am by Gerard Magliocca
 To take a simple example, Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:09 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Humphrey v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am by Brianne Gorod
Second, in a 1935 Supreme Court case called Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:42 am by Adrian Crespo
In doing so, the Court applied the framework set out in the influential Huawei v ZTE decision of the European Court of Justice, despite the patent in suit not being a standard essential patent. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sullivan, 658 F.2d 93, 96 n.4 (3d Cir. 1983) (en banc); Humphreys v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:10 am
Further, case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231]. [read post]