Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys"
Results 261 - 280
of 734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
Considering the director’s insulation from removal by the President, Judge Pillard looked to Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of alleged misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [see, for example, Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_06924.htm_________________The Discipline Book, - A 458 page guide to disciplinary actions involving public officers and employees. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:09 pm
Humphrey does not require otherwise. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:09 pm
Humphrey does not require otherwise. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:44 am
To take a simple example, Brown v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:26 am
Humphrey, 73 Va. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:09 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Humphrey v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 3:03 am
Judge Roush in her May 31, 2007 decision in Humphrey v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:30 pm
Humphrey is in Adobe .pdf format. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:53 pm
In Humphrey v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:42 am
In doing so, the Court applied the framework set out in the influential Huawei v ZTE decision of the European Court of Justice, despite the patent in suit not being a standard essential patent. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am
Second, in a 1935 Supreme Court case called Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
Sullivan, 658 F.2d 93, 96 n.4 (3d Cir. 1983) (en banc); Humphreys v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:10 am
Further, case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231]. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:56 am
(CAI), was affirmed (Flexible Steel Lacing Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am
In addition, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying ACT’s request for a permanent injunction because ACT failed to establish that it would sustain irreparable harm (ACT 898 Products, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am
The Eleventh Circuit agreed with that conclusion based on the plain language of the licensing agreement and affirmed the lower court’s decision (Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:56 am
Accordingly, the appellate court vacated the preliminary injunction to the extent that it enjoined the sale of products that the mark owner chose not to buy back, and it remanded the case for reexamination of which product lines were covered by the injunction (Really Good Stuff, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 7:53 am
An award of over $212,000 in nontaxable costs for expert witness expenses was, however, vacated, because there was no statutory basis for awarding those costs (San Diego Comic Convention v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:17 am
The court also affirmed a district judge’s order sanctioning L&L for failing to disclose its third-party license agreement in discovery (Beach Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
