Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys" Results 321 - 340 of 583
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2014, 9:30 pm by Kirti Datla
Moreover, our approach undermines enduring dicta in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR identifies the principal catalysts of the revolution as Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Nixon, Everett McKinley Dirksen, and Dr. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR identifies the principal catalysts of the revolution as Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Nixon, Everett McKinley Dirksen, and Dr. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:15 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Pero la Asamblea Legislativa puede ponerle limitaciones de términos a funcionarios que realizan labores “cuasi judiciales ” y “cuasi legislativas” debido a que estas necesitan independencia frente al ejecutivo (Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm by California Employment Law Letter
The cases were filed by: A medical transcriptionist terminated for tardiness and absenteeism due to her obsessive-compulsive disorder (Humphrey v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
Humphreys, Seventh Circuit: The Seventh Circuit indicated that mental incompetence can justify tolling the statute of limitations for a motion under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:42 am
   In this context, he referred to several long lasting cases, including Arcol v Capol (T-402/07, T-164/02, C-193/09) which took over 14 years until a final decision was reached. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Karen Tani
The Civil Rights Revolution transformed the Constitution, but not through judicial activism or Article V amendments. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sullivan, 658 F.2d 93, 96 n.4 (3d Cir. 1983) (en banc); Humphreys v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:00 am by Eric S. Solotoff
” In a case that I was involved in, Brawer v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]