Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys"
Results 61 - 80
of 746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2017, 2:48 pm
Supreme Court in that case, but not on that issue.Today, in Pittsylvania Department of Social Services v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 8:14 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 6:34 am
Humphreys. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:49 am
The specific test for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits was set out in Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, where it was held that with questions of social and economic strategy the Court will generally respect the legislature’s policy choice unless it was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:39 am
Humphreys School of Law) has posted The Great and Powerful Oz Revealed: The Ethics and Wisdom of the Scotus Leaks in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
Humphreys, Seventh Circuit: The Seventh Circuit indicated that mental incompetence can justify tolling the statute of limitations for a motion under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
Hueso v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Beginning with AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:27 am
Humphreys, decided on June 15. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 6:50 am
In this week’s case (Plishka-Humphreys v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:26 am
Humphreys. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Humphreys. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 6:57 am
Humphreys. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 12:11 pm
Beck v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:51 pm
In my post of October 27, 2011, entitled A Section 1983 Primer (5): Statutes of Limitations, I blogged about statutes of limitations in section 1983 cases. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 pm
Harvey v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 12:34 pm
Humphrey. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
Humphrey, but he later overturned the conviction, and that enabled the suit to be refiled and go foward. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
New Page 2 Opinion Pub Date Short Title/District 07a0119p.06 2007/04/02 Humphrey v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 11:36 am
I am reminded of Shamrock Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
