Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys" Results 61 - 80 of 702
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2020, 8:12 am by John W. Scanlan
The district court erred when it adopted factual findings made by a magistrate judge while deciding a motion for summary judgment because the magistrate judge had weighed the evidence (Heron Development Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
Accordingly, the appellate court vacated the preliminary injunction to the extent that it enjoined the sale of products that the mark owner chose not to buy back, and it remanded the case for reexamination of which product lines were covered by the injunction (Really Good Stuff, LLC v. [read post]
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 [read post]
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm by Margo Schlanger
Humphrey, which ruled that claims under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:55 am by snahmod
There is a special, and quite complicated, accrual rule, set out in Heck v. [read post]
An award of over $212,000 in nontaxable costs for expert witness expenses was, however, vacated, because there was no statutory basis for awarding those costs (San Diego Comic Convention v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:40 am by sydniemery
Loewy’s article The Fourth Amendment as a Device for Protecting the Innocent is cited in the following article: William Hopchak, Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
Red Bull GmbH v Big Horn UK Limited & Ors [2020] EWHC 124 (Ch) This case is an interesting commentary on the route that rights holders can pursue in order to challenge lookalike products. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:34 am by John W. Scanlan
The claims had been brought in good faith and the litigation was still at a very early stage (SnugglyCat, Inc. v. [read post]