Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys"
Results 121 - 140
of 748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:32 pm
In Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:32 pm
" In Trump v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm
Ante (citing Craig v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:07 am
v= pKSGyiT-o3o (“Ring one, Executive. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:51 am
Humphrey's Executor and Morrison v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:56 am
Accordingly, the appellate court vacated the preliminary injunction to the extent that it enjoined the sale of products that the mark owner chose not to buy back, and it remanded the case for reexamination of which product lines were covered by the injunction (Really Good Stuff, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 7:14 am
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 5:16 am
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm
Humphrey, which ruled that claims under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:39 am
Conversely, to the recent case Coty v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:55 am
There is a special, and quite complicated, accrual rule, set out in Heck v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 7:53 am
An award of over $212,000 in nontaxable costs for expert witness expenses was, however, vacated, because there was no statutory basis for awarding those costs (San Diego Comic Convention v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:40 am
Loewy’s article The Fourth Amendment as a Device for Protecting the Innocent is cited in the following article: William Hopchak, Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:56 am
(CAI), was affirmed (Flexible Steel Lacing Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:59 am
Red Bull GmbH v Big Horn UK Limited & Ors [2020] EWHC 124 (Ch) This case is an interesting commentary on the route that rights holders can pursue in order to challenge lookalike products. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:34 am
The claims had been brought in good faith and the litigation was still at a very early stage (SnugglyCat, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:33 am
We had previously written about a similar decision in Humphrey v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
