Search for: "Hunt v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 1,102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu)State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu)Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th… [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:17 pm by Scott Birkey and R. Clark Morrison
Other notable revisions to the concept of critical habitat include changes that address the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States The Judge has reduced the damages in the Oberlin college libel case from $44m to $25m to comply with various limits laid down in Ohio law. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States The father of a victim of the massacre at Sandy Hook, has won a defamation suit against the authors of a book called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, purporting a series of false claims. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:31 am by Steve Lubet
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Ableman v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
  As in the United States, the communication, to be protected, must  concern the offering or receiving of legal advice (as opposed to business advice or strategic counsel). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, in which the court held that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act, for this blog. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Herrera v Wyoming An 1868 treaty between the United States and the Crow Tribe promised that in exchange for most of the Tribe’s territory in modern-day Montana and Wyoming, its members would “have the right to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States so long as game may be found thereon . . . and peace subsists . . . on the borders of the hunting districts. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Wyoming, in which the court held that “an old treaty allowing Native Americans to hunt on federal land is still valid. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
The treaty survives, and the Crow Tribe retains the right to hunt on unoccupied lands of the United States, including "unoccupied" portions of national forest, despite state law. [read post]
16 May 2019, 3:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
Section 922(y)(2), for example, exempts those that come to the United States for hunting or sporting purposes. [read post]