Search for: "Hunt v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 792
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm by Rohit De
Kashmir, was a semi-autonomous princely state in 1947 operating outside of colonial law, soon to be drawn into a long drawn out international conflict between India and Pakistan with successive emergency regimes in both Indian and Pakistani administered Kashmir. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  After all, in 1841 we get the first of the Supreme Court’s slavery point-counter points in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The departure from the American approach appears to have occurred as early as in 1875 in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Hunt — In a March 13, 2020 opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit handed Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 10:21 am by Steve Kalar
”The "Thin Ice" Band, with Victim-Company Owner Russ Lesser, AUSA Greg Lesser, and James Miller United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Josh Blackman
We offered some tentative findings about the linguistic claims made by the majority and dissent in D.C. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 1:32 pm by Charlotte Butash, Benjamin Wittes
See Government’s Supplemental and Amended Sentencing Memorandum, United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Kopel
In other words, "the sorts of weapons protected were those 'in common use at the time.'" Id. at 627 (quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The MBTA only applies to migratory birds native to the United States, which includes several types of Falconiformes (vultures, kites, eagles, hawks, caracaras, and falcons) and Strigiformes (owls). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In Felter, we determined the hunting and fishing rights of the individuals were not abrogated because the statute did not clearly abrogate them—this is a narrowing construction. [read post]