Search for: "Hunter v. Hale"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
From Jackson v. [read post]
The appearance of a substantial defence in possession claims, and property guardians and possession.
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
Noting Lady Hale’s comment at (35) and (36) of Akerman, that: She agreed with this court that the court can deal with possession claims summarily “without the summary judgment provisions of CPR Part 24 being invoked”. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
In this post, Joanna Clark and Emma Ainsley of CMS discuss the judgment handed down by the UK Supreme Court on 15 July 2020 in a referral from the High Court of Justiciary, the Scottish criminal appeal court, in the matter of Sutherland v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2020] UKSC 32 concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained by so-called “paedophile hunter” groups in criminal trials. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
The Law Society Gazette had a piece “‘Heir hunter’ agrees £40,000 damages over defamatory emails”. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Hicks, Andrew Hunter and Mark Cancian, and will be moderated by AEI Resident Fellow Mackenzie Eaglen. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 10:12 am
Perry, from 1974, and Menna v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
Lord Wilson gives the lead majority judgment, with which Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Carnwath agree. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Federal Judge Shifts eDiscovery Cost in Potential Class Action - http://bit.ly/PBEZGU (Saranac Hale Spencer) Predictive Coding v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
Feminist JurisprudenceKF2300.F46 2010Feminist judgments : from theory to practice / edited by Rosemary Hunter, Clare McGlynn and Erika Rackley [foreword by Brenda Hale].Oxford Portland, Or. : Hart, 2010. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:08 pm
While the latter is typically thought to be tangential to the holding in the instant case, it may later be accorded persuasive value in legal argumentation and/or future decisions; in other words, it may eventually attain the status of ratio decidendi.In contrast to their English counterparts, American judges have more discretionary power to bypass or otherwise disregard constraining or binding precedent (‘relaxed’ v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Protecting child claimants from “fortune hunters and thieves” Detaining and deporting the mentally ill Specialist Mental Health Courts are a good idea which may never happen Filed under: Art. 14 | Anti-Discrimination, Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Mental Health, Social Care Tagged: Seal v UK [read post]