Search for: "Husband, P v. Wife, P"
Results 1 - 20
of 652
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONM-P. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:57 am
See Cook v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 1:35 am
Yes, the court ruled in Shaver v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 1:35 am
Yes, the court ruled in Shaver v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 1:57 pm
Street v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 10:15 am
Not in the case of Johnson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 12:56 am
Husband & wife directly owned and operated the motel. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:24 am
Thorpe, Reinbold, Trustee, v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:24 am
Thorpe, Reinbold, Trustee, v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:17 am
The wife’s argument that the husband no longer had any interest in the former marital residence was based on the case of Colucci v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:08 am
Yes, in the case of Austin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:53 am
Mizrachi v Mizrachi 2011 NY Slip Op 02640 Decided on March 29, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department affirmed the supreme court’s judgment equitably distributing the marital residence to wife, awarding her exclusive use and occupancy of the marital home, awarding her child support, and holding husband in civil contempt for willfully violating a pendente lite child [...] [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:53 am
The Virginia Court of Appeals in the case of McCoy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:47 am
See 41 Am.Jur.2d, Husband and Wife, § 31 (2004). [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 12:12 pm
case=18302523943291676915&q=+Miller+v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 9:51 am
In this case, the divorce judge did not err in finding personal jurisdiction over husband pursuant to the long-arm statute based on allegations in wife’s complaint that i) husband deserted her on specific date; ii) husband’s desertion had continued since that date without interruption and husband has not returned to the matrimonial domicile iii) wife was domiciled in and a bonafide resident of Virginia; iv)… [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
Fitzgerald v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
Fitzgerald v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:20 am
Although most of the couple’s income had been derived from the husband’s withholdings, the bankruptcy court judge ruled that the husband and wife were each entitled to 50% of the tax refund, based on the case of Bass v. [read post]
