Search for: "ILLINOIS v. MICHIGAN"
Results 1 - 20
of 772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
Owner of two towing companies finds himself crosswise with both the Michigan State Police and the city of Taylor. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 2:34 pm
Michigan, Southern Division, 2020). [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:17 am
There are also links to broadband articles from Texas, Illinois, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Michigan (mapping northern Michigan’s broadband desert), and Ohio (challenges bringing broadband to its southern Appalachian counties), among others. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 2:41 pm
See Eckardt v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
In September 2020, Judicial Watch sued Illinois on behalf of the Illinois Conservative Union and three of its members for refusing to disclose voter roll data in violation of Federal law. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 1:47 pm
Starr v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:41 pm
As I have noted before and as U Illinois Law School Dean Vikram Amar argues extremely persuasively in a new article, although various Justices have expressed support for this "legislatures only" theory, which builds on a three-Justice concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:32 am
Illinois v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Each year, scholars at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a Michigan think tank, use a statistical analysis of available data to estimate smuggling rates for each state.[1] Their most recent report uses 2018 data and finds that smuggling rates generally rise in states after they adopt cigarette tax increases. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:46 pm
“In plain English, the University of Michigan appears to have created ‘whites-only’ and ‘non-whites-only’ events, in a manner reminiscent of the doctrine of racial segregation overturned by Brown v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:11 am
The NBAM initially covered eight states, but now includes 22 states total: California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 10:18 am
Working from a recent piece by Professor Dorf and his two co-authors (here) and a complementary but not overlapping piece by Illinois Law's Dean Vikram Amar (here), I explain why the legal case against allowing state legislatures to bypass their governors when appointing electors is airtight. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
In the Pennsylvania case, Trump v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
” In cases in Michigan (Michigan Alliance for Retired Americans v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 1:46 pm
There have been insurer-favorable decisions on motions to dismiss in federal courts out of Texas, Florida, Kansas, California, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Illinois, Georgia and Minnesota and in state courts in Illinois, Michigan, Florida, California and the District of Columbia. [read post]
