Search for: "ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES" Results 161 - 180 of 4,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm by Amanda Traphagan
The United States Supreme Court recently decided Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:35 am by Jeffrey Brown
" Again, the court found that only a rational basis is required and that one exists here.In a dissent, Justice Burke wrote that the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by Russell Knight
“As early as 1872, the [United States Supreme] Court recognized that it was ‘a general principle of the highest importance to the proper administration of justice that a judicial officer, in exercising the authority vested in him, [should] be free to act upon his own convictions, without apprehension of personal consequences to himself. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:21 pm by Wells Bennett
That’s the gist of  today’s ruling in this terrorism case, which is now pending in the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:22 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Eric Alan Johnson (University of Illinois College of Law) has posted Cause-in-Fact After Burrage v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:31 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:38 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court determined that a 2005 Illinois law limiting damages awards in medical malpractice cases violates the state constitution earlier this month. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:19 am by Micha Nandaraj Gallo
 Its decision focused on the nature of the harm necessary for Article III standing as outlined in the United States Supreme Court’s 2016 Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:29 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Today was the due date for amicus briefs supporting the state in Williams v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:51 am by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
Judge Ruben Castillo, the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, recently declined to follow a widely publicized Illinois Appellate Court decision in which the Appellate Court held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required consideration for a restrictive covenant in Illinois. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Marilyn Wesel
Supporters of the bill argue this does not conflict with federal law established in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 5:03 am by Russell Knight
  The United States Supreme Court has already ruled that Americans can do what they want in the privacy of their own bedroom, Lawrence v. [read post]