Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF B.R" Results 1 - 20 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2007, 6:59 am
The Court adopted the reasoning set forth in In re Ramussen, 349 B.R. 747 (Bankr.M.D. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 3:01 am
The opposite position was adopted in the In re Wilson, 356 B.R. 114, (Bankr.S.Del.2006) and In re Hartwick, 352 B.R. 867 (Bankr.D.Minn.2006) cases which held that the debtor can deduct the vehicle ownership whether or not a debtor actually has a note or lease payment.On July 13, 2007, apparently the first decision on this issue in the Southern District of Florida was issued in In re Benedetti, ___ B.R. ___, 2007 WL 2083576… [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:01 am
Although Chase suggests that the multiple-transfer approach adopted by the First Circuit in In re Lazarus has been followed only by a small minority of bankruptcy courts, it is in fact the prevailing view. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:40 am
On July 6, 2007, the court in In re Electric Machinery Enterprises, Inc., ___ B.R. ___, 2007 WL 3031445 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Fla.) [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:45 am by Larisa Vaysman
Although the Sixth Circuit did not address the doctrine in this case, at least one other bankruptcy court in the circuit has applied the exception, see, e.g., In re Colvin, 288 B.R. 477, 483 (Bankr. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 7:57 am
The court found the cases of In re Guevara, 258 B.R. 59 (Bankr.S.D. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 8:23 am by Jordan Bublick  In the case of In re Chinchilla, 202 B.R. 1010 (S.D.Fla.1996)(Mark,J.), the debtor moved an award of for his attorney's fees and costs under section 523(d) for the defense of 523(a)(2)(A) fraud claim filed against him. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 6:26 am
In the case of In re MacKay, ___ B.R. ___, 2007 WL 4248638 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Pa.) [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:46 am
On June 20, 2007 the decision in In re Ellinger, ___ B.R. ___, 2007 WL 1976750 (Bkrtcy.D.Minn.) [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:00 am
Last November I reported on the status of the Ninth Circuit appeal in In re: N.C.P. [read post]