Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF B.R" Results 41 - 60 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2007, 12:52 am
"), with In re Hall, 222 B.R. 275, 278 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1998) ( "Although courts have criticized Mendez, it remains binding precedent in this circuit"). [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:03 pm by Keith C. Owens and Michael R. Herz
  A recent opinion from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, In re The Hacienda Company LLC, Case No. 2:22-bk-15163-NB, 674 B.R. 748 (Bankr. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
  See also In re Kara Homes, 363 B.R. 399 (Bankr. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:07 am
Va. 2009) (adopting the UCC definition of "goods"); accord In re Goody's Family Clothing, Inc., 401 B.R. 131, 134 (Bankr. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
See In re Jordan, 313 B.R. at 256 (quoting In re Lazaro, 128 B.R. at 168, 172-74, which in turn quotes In re Boeckman, 54 B.R. at 111: “[T]he permissive language used in Section 1412 . . . merely says that a district court ‘may’ transfer a case to another district; it does not say it must transfer the case . . . . [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 8:29 am by Jay Lawrence Westbrook
Compare, In re Elcoteq, Inc., 521 B.R. 189 (Houser, J.) [read post]
2 May 2012, 1:35 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
  A professional seeking to have its engagement approved by a court must disclose all connections, regardless of the whether they are sufficient to rise to the level of a disqualifying interest, citing In re Leslie Fay, 175 B.R. 525, 533 (Bankr. [read post]