Search for: "IN RE MARK K."
Results 1 - 20
of 1,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2007, 11:05 pm
Maybe we're not using the right medium to communicate 401(k)?. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 4:27 am
" In re Brian Aquart, Serial No. 88245504 (March 17, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia Lynch). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
In 2009, the Swiss company Künzli SwissSchuh AG (‘Künzli’) [the opponent Künzli Swiss is Swiss; the applicant K-Swiss is American; the confusing similarity between companies' names is only due to the irony of destiny] made an application for invalidity, claiming that K-Swiss’ trade mark was devoid of distinctive character under what is now Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation… [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:46 am
"The Board declined to find that K-C's mark is famous or even strong, due to lack of evidence. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
See In re White, 73 USPQ2d 1713 (TTAB 2004). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 3:13 am
For those getting ready to file their annual report, the SEC has posted the latest version of Form 10-K on its “Forms” page – you can also find a link to the pdf in our “Form 10-K” Practice Area, as well as a downloadable cover page in Word for ease of use. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:57 am
He also noted that the PTO has been consistent in refusing registration of marks analogous to F**K PROJECT. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 11:09 am
I am a bit delayed but, a few days ago, Res Ipsa passed the 62,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 3:55 am
, and three composite marks [IMAGINE ME ACADEMY & DESIGN, re:imagine/ATL & Design, and an illegible word-and-design mark], all for educational services for K-12, or educational services at an unspecified academic level, which are presumed to include K-12. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:30 am
The Third Circuit’s decision in In re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation breathed new life into the FTC’s fight against pay-for-delay settlement agreements. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 3:22 am
In re Shane Marquess, Serial No. 86478749 (September 1, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT June 27, 2008 THOMAS K. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 5:02 am
As to the applicant's logo mark, the Board agreed with the Examining Attorney that the word "kartrite" is the dominant element, not the styilized letter "k. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:58 am
Examining Attorney Karen K. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:30 am
Richard Re, Beyond the Marks Rule, 132 Harv. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:06 am
Malik (D0619); Deepak K. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 3:13 am
Results will be found in the first comment.In re Sensory Path Inc., Serial No. 88667617 (May 31, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:21 am
The Board remanded the case to the Office for consideration of the applicability of res judicata (a/k/a claim preclusion) based on the prior appeal. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
In re Don Calder, Serial No. 85143799 (January 29, 2015) [not precedential].The Board found that the design element is dominant in the cited mark, since it is much larger than the words REPUBLIK OF KALIFORNIA and is "by far the most visually significant element of the mark. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 3:05 am
[Refusal of the mark LEON HUGHES’ COASTERS for "Live performances by a musical group," in view of the registered mark THE COASTERS for "entertainment services in the nature of a musical group"].In re Korn Ferry Leadership Consulting Corporation, Serial No. 85932617 (July 6, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
