Search for: "IN RE PROJECT COST AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT" Results 301 - 320 of 356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 8:47 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Labor Department also assessed $11,687 in civil penalties against the employer because of the willful and repeat nature of the violations. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:11 am by Eric Miller
Is judicial engagement transferable out of specialized courts and into the courtroom more generally? [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  For post-September 30, 2014 plan years, the Code provides for further adjustments in the fee based on increases in the projected per capita amount of National Health Expenditures. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
See Two Recent Decisions Highlight the Special Powers Held By LAFCo. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 5:33 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Labor Department also assessed $11,687 in civil penalties against the employer because of the willful and repeat nature of the violations. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 7:11 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While all employers face heightened prosecution risks, federal officials specifically are targeting government contractors, health care, technology and certain other industry employers for special scrutiny.  [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 10:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
See Appellate Court Re-grades EIR Exam and Gives L.A.U.S.D. high marks; Assigns More Homework to Address Pedestrian Safety for High School Project. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
Samsung:  Special Backgrounder Compilation of Selected Stories Legal Hold and Preservation at Center of Apple/Samsung Battle - http://bit.ly/OXA172 (Jim McGann) Samsung, Apple Spar Over Gadgets' Specs | Reuters - http://reut.rs/OKmFvC (Dan Levine, Edwin Chin) Australian Patent Dispute: Apple v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:10 am by Dan Kahn
What Choice Should Be Presented - Special Circumstances: The FTC identifies a number of circumstances in which special principles should apply with respect to choice: Take-It-or-Leave-It: The FTC states that “take-it-or-leave-it” choice for “important products or services” raises concerns when consumers have few alternatives, such as, it asserts, in the market for broadband Internet access. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
More to come on this project.  [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 8:27 am by judith
Redesigning legal services I don’t mean to be simplistic or to re-state widely understood criticisms of legal systems.  [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:18 am by David Fraser
Media reports referring to Minister Toews’ rejection of Commissioner Stoddart’s concerns and quoting his defence of the regime suggest that the government will re-introduce Bills C-50, C-51, and C-52 (“the Bills”) in essentially the same form in which they appeared in the last Parliament. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 6:06 am by Kenneth Anderson
The problem with Nudge, as many critics pointed out, was that it had one or two terrific examples of where re-setting the default behavior would have a huge and positive effect on outcomes without compromising liberty very much.   [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 1:10 pm by Student Lawyer
” Rahul Kapoor, firm-wide hiring partner for Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, agrees with Kott’s assessment. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 1:10 pm by Student Lawyer
” Rahul Kapoor, firm-wide hiring partner for Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, agrees with Kott’s assessment. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 1:20 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
Is the time ripe for (re)articulation of the authority of the Good by way of abandoning the capitalist criteria for market success? [read post]