Search for: "IN RE RULES FOR THE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL ELECTIONS"
Results 1 - 20
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2008, 10:06 am
The Standing Committee on Judicial Ethics and Elections Practices has issued Opinion JE08-005. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:53 am
The Commission on Judicial Performance Review conducts reviews judge prior to a judge’s re-election and releases the results to the public (see here for results from prior years). [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:49 am
Judge Jean has, AFAIK, performed ably on both courts, and she deserves to be elected, or re-elected (depending how you see it). [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
The plan would replace the current Judicial Selection Committee, under which elected officials, senior judicial figures, and legal professionals share responsibility for appointing the 15 Supreme Court justices. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:02 am
“Judicial Ethics Opinion 22-29” — “The Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics responds to written inquiries from New York state’s approximately 3,600 judges and justices, as well as hundreds of judicial hearing officers, support magistrates, court attorney-referees, and judicial candidates (both judges and non-judges seeking election to judicial office)” “A full-time judge may preside over cases… [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 8:28 pm
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected requests from two groups of Wisconsin voters and the Democratic National Committee to reinstate modifications to election rules that a federal judge had ordered for the November election because of the coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:27 am
Provides for re-confirmation at end of every 8 year term. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
The response was positive, so I’ve put together one for the upcoming judicial elections. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 12:25 pm
There are a number of practical reasons why it is probably best to have a mixture of elected judges and selected judges [and] the vision of benign aristocratic rule is given the lie by the reality of self-interest as there are no bright-line rules as to where selection is better than election or where election is better than selection. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
Was it a full victory for the legislature, in that the Supreme Court had provided a judicial stamp of approval to its investigatory power? [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
The proposal comes from the advisory committee on criminal rules for the Judicial Conference of the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
Circuit ruled in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 10:25 am
They’re right. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:01 am
The suggested contributions were written as: $150 “Sustained” $250 “Affirmed” $500 “So Ordered” $1000 “Favorable Ruling” Recipients of the invitations then were directed to make checks payable to the “Re-Elect Judge Becky Committee” and to send the checks to a particular address. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
To be sure, such a decision would send a signal by judicially blessing elector discretion. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 10:40 am
"It's clear we're running out of time," Tobias said. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 12:39 pm
A judicial ethics committee denounced the advertisement in pretty strong language. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:12 pm
Yes, they’re not excluded from examination. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
You have a First Amendment right to belong to the minority party, but that means you're less likely to get the committee assignment you want (since your party has fewer seats on the committees). [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
And now we’re sharing the results with Lawfare readers so that you can have a better understanding of what may come if and when an electoral controversy arises. [read post]
