Search for: "IN RE SPENCER" Results 341 - 360 of 935
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 3842045, at *7-8 (E.D. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
No, not excluded. (4) Trial judge err re fault element of “making available” offence? [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Spencer, 700 F.3d 317 (U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
     [1] Signatories other than me include:  Janet Alexander, Stanford Law School; Stephen Burbank, Penn Law School; Kevin Clermont, Cornell Law School; John Coffee, Columbia Law School; James Cox, Duke Law School; Scott Dodson, Hastings Law School; Jonah Gelbach, Penn Law School; Alexandra Lahav, Connecticut Law School; David Marcus, University of Arizona Law School; Norman Spaulding, Stanford Law School; and Benjamin Spencer, Washington & Lee Law School. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:39 am by Paul Maharg
 Eg Pat Leighton’s and Maureen Spencer’s fine papers, that encompassed legal history, history of legal education, education, politics. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:27 am by Paul Maharg
A re-assessment from an historical perspective. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:28 am by Stephen Page
Justice Johns in the Family Court case of Re Spencer stated: "The making of a declaration such as is sought by the applicant carries with it a heavy weight of responsibility. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 9:12 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“So we can’t say if somebody files a complaint but we like the little libraries—we think they’re cute—so we ignore it. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
For another recent case holding that a trademark can’t be registered because it’s disparaging, see this post about the appellate decision in In re Geller & Spencer. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
Mr Mellor QC thought that the decision was fair, but warned that the judgment highlights the possibility that the “long arm of digital copyright extends to end users who may re-tweet material including links etc. without having the ability to check whether they may be infringing copyright”.A recap on hyperlinking and communication to the public came next, in light of the Svensson decision (C-466/12), where it was held that while provision of clickable links to protected works is… [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Before you huff and puff about the iniquity of it all, bear in mind that you lot (landlords) had the section 21 decision of Spencer v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 2:36 pm by Giles Peaker
— Nick Kocharhook (@k9) May 15, 2014 Agent would let themselves in unannounced constantly, twice while I was in the shower, once while vomiting with food poisoning #LDNlandlord — MsAnthropia (@MsAnthropia) May 15, 2014 We’ve now seen two separate tenants whose landlords or family expect to use the flat whenever they’re in town. [read post]