Search for: "IN RE SPENCER"
Results 381 - 400
of 904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Spencer, 700 F.3d 317 (U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
[1] Signatories other than me include: Janet Alexander, Stanford Law School; Stephen Burbank, Penn Law School; Kevin Clermont, Cornell Law School; John Coffee, Columbia Law School; James Cox, Duke Law School; Scott Dodson, Hastings Law School; Jonah Gelbach, Penn Law School; Alexandra Lahav, Connecticut Law School; David Marcus, University of Arizona Law School; Norman Spaulding, Stanford Law School; and Benjamin Spencer, Washington & Lee Law School. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:28 am
Justice Johns in the Family Court case of Re Spencer stated: "The making of a declaration such as is sought by the applicant carries with it a heavy weight of responsibility. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 9:12 am
“So we can’t say if somebody files a complaint but we like the little libraries—we think they’re cute—so we ignore it. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
Mr Mellor QC thought that the decision was fair, but warned that the judgment highlights the possibility that the “long arm of digital copyright extends to end users who may re-tweet material including links etc. without having the ability to check whether they may be infringing copyright”.A recap on hyperlinking and communication to the public came next, in light of the Svensson decision (C-466/12), where it was held that while provision of clickable links to protected works is… [read post]
15 May 2014, 2:47 am
In re Pamela Geller and Robert B. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:16 pm
DC In re Geller (Fed. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:55 pm
In In re Geller, (Fed. [read post]
11 May 2014, 4:34 pm
Courtesy of Zillow CEO, Spencer Rascoff (@spencerrascoff) one of the parents, we’re blessed to get Bezos’ comments. [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:07 pm
Never mind the fact that the agent failed to provide sex offender treatment promptly, despite court orders to do so.In the exposé Free to Reoffend: A Bottom Line Investigation, Nakia Spencer reports Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge David Borowski as saying,If they're not getting their treatment, that increases their risk to the community, it increases their risk of reoffending.It's obviously the DOC's responsibility to follow through on that and the DOC is… [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 4:41 pm
Yes, you’re losing them. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 6:08 am
51% say no.Bells rang out in Washington State re: mud slide. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
The EEOC quotes its Philadelphia District Director, Spencer H. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Re an application by Central Craigavon Ltd for Judicial Review, heard 15 May 2013. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
