Search for: "IN RE SUPREME COURT ADJUDICATION, ETC."
Results 1 - 20
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2025, 7:39 pm
Supreme Court for final resolution, which could take years to come about. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 12:32 pm
Here’s the Statement of Claim filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia on November 4, 2024, also from a major law firm. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 12:22 pm
Section 10(j) Injunctive Relief: Memorandum GC 24-05, previously covered here, which implored all Regional Offices to continue “aggressively seek[ing] Section 10(j) injunctions,” despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 12:22 pm
Section 10(j) Injunctive Relief: Memorandum GC 24-05, previously covered here, which implored all Regional Offices to continue “aggressively seek[ing] Section 10(j) injunctions,” despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2024, 5:28 am
Final adjudication Clause: Final adjudication clause needs to be clearly defined. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 11:50 am
It is also predictable that various federal circuit courts of appeal may likewise issue conflicting rulings, thus requiring review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:57 am
It is also predictable that various federal circuit courts of appeal may likewise issue conflicting rulings, thus requiring review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
The moral of the story is that we should decenter sacred texts and Supreme Courts in our understanding of what makes constitutions work. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 12:59 pm
Persily was interviewed by Stanford Legal co-hosts Pamela Karlan, the Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law and co-director of Stanford Law School’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic (as well as a co-author on the Law of Democracy casebook), and Richard Ford, the George E. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 3:42 pm
Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:22 pm
For that, again perhaps, Jung, Foucault, and Borges, may provide a useful re-orienting perspective. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm
Adult magazines, adult films, etc. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
Fifty years ago today, the Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:17 pm
So if you’re outside BC, check out CSO anytime. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:23 pm
As things current stand, that doesn't work in the Fifth Circuit, and it might not work anywhere if the Supreme Court overturns the 2nd Circuit's decision in Purdue Pharma. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Trump hasn't made that argument in the lower courts and it isn't included in the QP, but the Government suggested at oral argument that the Court can address it on this appeal if it wishes to do so. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
One respondent explained: “I don’t think it will reach the Supreme Court because either a Republican Administration won’t want to appeal it to the Supreme Court, or because a Democratic Administration will read the Circuit court opinion and realize that, with this Supreme Court, the rule stands no chance. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
. and it’s quite clear that they’re not interpreting the law, they’re making the law. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
They take it all the way to the Supreme Court! [read post]
