Search for: "IN RE THOMAS MINORS" Results 21 - 40 of 595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2006, 3:46 am
In re Thomas-McCants Media, Inc., Serial No. 76462525 (July 14, 2006) [not citable].Applicant Thomas-McCants conceded that the term BLACK EXPO is at least merely descriptive for its services (and the PTO''s evidence established that the mark is "highly descriptive"), but it contended that the mark "as a whole is in a sufficiently stylized form to permit registration," and further that the mark has acquired secondary meaning.The Board noted… [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:57 pm
Insights from the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Stéphanie Lagoutte, The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights - a confusing smart mix of soft and hard international human rights law Christoph Good, Mission creeps: the (unintended) re-enforcement of the actor's discussion in international law through the expansion of soft law instruments in the business and human rights nexus Anette Faye Jacobsen, Soft law within participation rights: tools in… [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 7:48 am
That's not true when local officials choose to incarcerate people they don't have to, like they're doing in Nacogdoches. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:26 am
In re Russell Ortiz, Serial No. 86817718 (November 22, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:11 am by Conor McEvily
The Supreme Court sustained minor damage in yesterday’s earthquake.  [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:11 pm by Kirk Dryer
My team is spending a considerable amount of time running energy models to prove and re-prove our initial results. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:17 pm by Michael C. Dorf
EMA, the Court invalidated restrictions on the sale of video games to minors. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
We're slamming someone on the open forum that is the internet. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 8:30 am
America's history, we're told, is a "long and lamentable record of stymieing the right of racial minorities to participate in the political process," and this case is a "chapter" in that history: "A majority of the Michigan electorate changed the basic rules of the political process in that State in a manner that uniquely disadvantaged racial minorities. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
  But you're almost certainly going to like one approach over the other, depending on your personal jurisprudential (and perhaps political) tastes.There are nonetheless two parts of Judge Thomas' dissent that strike me as undeniably true. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 8:46 am
Articles found in my building's re-cycle bin. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:52 am by Paul Thomson
The driver, Thomas Chidester, of Salem, Virginia was charged with reckless driving. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:44 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The Chief Justice asked about minors, and counsel answered that for such beneficiaries, a minor’s estate must be opened in the probate division. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:05 am by David Post
Justice Thomas concluded that it did not, because "the founding generation believed parents had absolute authority over their minor children [and] would not have considered it an abridgment of 'the freedom of speech' to restrict speech [to minors] that bypasses minors' parents. [read post]