Search for: "IN RE THOMAS MINORS" Results 101 - 120 of 928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by jonathanturley
” [Mystal later attacked Justice Thomas on MSNBC, describing Thomas as a “mutilated version of a black justice” who just did whatever his wife, who is white, tells him to do. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 11:54 am by Lindsay Kee, ACLU of Tennessee
Throughout history, those in power have attempted to control access to information, to maintain — in the words of Thomas Jefferson — "tyranny over the mind of man. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
  And certainly the four justices in the minority would not find tax strategy claims eligible for patentability. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:40 am by Ms. JD Weekly Roundup
Martha McClusky: Eliminate "Affluent Husband Care" (An Indictment of a Sexist Tax Code) NY Judge Orders Trial Team to Include Women and Minorities WSJ Asks Why Are Women Leaving Wall St.? [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:17 pm by William Weinberg
The police think he's a gang member, too, so they're adding those charges. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Post-Seattle Cases That Eclipsed Seattle’s Essence So if Justice Kennedy’s (re)reading of Seattle is less than convincing, is there a way to justify his bottom line? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
[I]t seems increasingly clear that universities are focused on “aesthetic” solutions unlikely to help deserving members of minority groups.... [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm by Ari Waldman
Do minors even have speech rights (ask Justice Thomas for a resounding “Pfft. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
But the usage really got going when Clarence Thomas came along: "'We're going to Bork him,’ the National Organization for Women has promised. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:42 am by Elie Mystal
Thomas says the Constitution doesn’t protect the right to speak freely to minors or for minors to access speech. [read post]
25 May 2023, 3:53 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Once they're up, I planned to link them here and make minor efforts to publicize them to potentially interested readers.But one of them has been pulled by SSRN due to bizarro malfunctioning on their part that I have as not yet been able to get them to correct.The paper at issue is called "Ancillary Benefits and Income Versus Consumption Taxation in Liam Murphy's and Thomas Nagel's The Myth of Ownership. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:04 pm
As the case develops, it needs to be re-evaluated. [read post]