Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF JACK S. JENNINGS" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2020, 7:16 am by Elliot Setzer
As America responds to the killing of George Floyd by a white police officer in Minneapolis, Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast, featuring an interview with Dr. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 8:52 pm by Hadley Baker
Jack Goldsmith responded with a less alarmed view of the action. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 9:22 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anderson analyzed former President Trump’s declassification authority in light of the Mar-a-Lago FBI search and discussed whether classification matters from a legal defense standpoint. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am by Tia Sewell
Jen Patja Howell shared this week’s edition of Rational Security, featuring commentary on President-elect Biden’s latest national security appointments and discussion of the historic second impeachment of President Trump: Quinta Jurecic shared the House Judiciary Committee’s article of impeachment against President Trump and its accompanying report. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am by Anushka Limaye
Jessica Marsden considered whether or not President Trump’s tweets led prosecutors to seek the death penalty for Sayfullo Saipov, and what the responsibility of the courts should be in resisting presidential influence in criminal matters. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:47 am by Jordan Brunner
” Secretary of Defense James Mattis spoke with both NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and U.K. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:15 am by Anna Salvatore
Bob Bauer and Jack Goldsmith explained why they wrote “After Trump,” a detailed account of how to reform the presidency after Trump leaves office. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
” Goldsmith also wrote a follow-up to his earlier post on the Mueller report’s statutory interpretation analysis, adding to an active debate on the matter. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
” Goldsmith also wrote a follow-up to his earlier post on the Mueller report’s statutory interpretation analysis, adding to an active debate on the matter. [read post]
1 May 2014, 1:33 pm by Steve Vladeck
On the other side are folks like Ben, Bobby, Jack, and Matt, who have argued that Congress should generally delegate to the President the authority to identify such groups going forward now, at least in part to add more transparency to the current opaqueness surrounding exactly which groups are and are not covered by the AUMF (opaqueness that Jen and I also decry). [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm by Victoria Clark
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg welcomed the announcement. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:51 am by Seán Binder
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS – TRUMP LEGAL MATTERS A years-long criminal investigation into the Trump Organization’s valuations of a golf club in Westchester County, New York, has been closed, the county’s district attorney, Miriam Rocah, confirmed yesterday. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 7:00 am by Staley Smith
"   Yishai and Jen Williams gave us an update on the Middle East where tensions between Bahrain and Iran continue to rise, Israel is providing limited cooperation to the ICC’s preliminary examination into last summer’s Gaza [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 7:00 am by Staley Smith
"   Yishai and Jen Williams gave us an update on the Middle East where tensions between Bahrain and Iran continue to rise, Israel is providing limited cooperation to the ICC’s preliminary examination into last summer’s Gaza [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 8:45 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Jack Cable, Sydney Frankenberg, Pierce Lowary, Chase Small, Michael A. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:51 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Check out Jacks readout of the hearing here, and get your witness testimony here. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm by William Appleton
Pantucci and Taneja contemplated the various explanations of al-Qaeda’s silence on the matter and the organization's declining global capacity. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:38 am by Jack Goldsmith
Jack noted yesterday that this line of argument by Foreign Minister Zarif “prejudge[s] the question whether any Executive agreement between President Obama and Iran will in fact be a binding legal agreement under international law. [read post]