Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL ANTHONY EDDINGS" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2016, 11:25 am by Legal Profession Prof
An opinion from the Georgia Supreme Court This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Review Panel recommending that Michael Anthony Eddings (“Eddings”) (State Bar No. 238751) be disbarred for several violations of the... [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 10:32 am by Elim
Morse, eds., Legal, Moral, and Metaphysical Truths: The Philosophy of Michael Moore (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016). [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:50 am by Amy Howe
” At ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser discusses Justice Anthony Kennedy’s opinion for the Court in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
In a podcast for the Constitution Center, Carrie Severino and Michael Dorf try to “make sense of an unpredictable year” at the Court, while Sullivan & Cromwell looks back at the business cases at the Court. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Christian Green (Ed.), 2019).Stephen Matthew Feldman, Having Your Cake and Eating It Too? [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
“On the very idea of spiritual values,” in Anthony O’Hear, ed. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reason’s Hit & Run blog, Damon Root lists “five matters that I would like to hear Kavanaugh address as he faces the Senate Judiciary Committee in the coming days. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:04 am by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
Anthony Pedicini, a political consultant working for Lombardo, said the reaction to Kompothecras’ involvement is misplaced. [read post]
8 May 2011, 5:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Michael Murphy destroyer launced. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Another account of the argument comes from Michael Bobelian at Forbes. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
magazine, Fran Korten notes that “[n]o matter how the court rules” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” Even those who disagree with Greenhouse on substantive matters of law could never accuse her of being prone to exaggeration. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Michael Wear urges that “to the extent the Kavanaugh hearings are going to be a policy referendum, let’s be sure the nation hears from a party that is interested in more than just the fate of Roe vs. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:11 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
Then the cause is important enough that international law doesn’t matter. [read post]