Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE MONTANA RULES" Results 81 - 100 of 817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2016, 4:40 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
For example, Missouri (Rule 4-7.1(f)) and Montana (Rule 7.1(f)) specifically classify as misleading any communication that “advertises for a specific type of case concerning which the lawyer has neither experience nor competence. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by John Jascob
Montana sought a stay of the final rule in its entirety for the length of the pendency of litigation in the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 2:24 pm by Staff Attorney
  A similar claim, excessive trading, under FINRA’s suitability rule involves just the first two elements. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 10:02 am by Diana L. Skaggs
Father first argues the Kentucky court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because the Petition was filed in Kentucky before the Montana court determined Kentucky was the more convenient forum. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:46 am by Kevin
That’s not his only bill on this important matter, though. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:21 am by David DePaolo
"The coup d' grace was a slate of Montana high court rulings that essentially make the "lunch hour" non-compensable because the employer lacks control over the employee's activities during that break period.The foundation for the Arising Out Of/Course Of Employment rule lies in the master/servant relationship. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 11:30 am by Alice O'Brien
The petitioners seek a sweeping ruling that would prevent states from enforcing a myriad of state constitutional provisions safeguarding their free, nonsectarian public schools. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Justice Laurie McKinnon concurred with respect to the majority’s rulings on choice of law and prejudgment interest issues, but dissented from the court’s rulings on the duty to defend and part of the court’s rulings on the amount of the judgment. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:25 pm
The district court dismissed Paulsson’s claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), concluding it did not have subject matter jurisdiction to issue a remedy because the Alberta Act vested exclusive jurisdiction in the Court of the Queen’s Bench of Alberta. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
In any event, today the Montana Legislature passed a joint resolution condemning proposed Rule 8.4, in part on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 8:06 pm by John Culhane
(Of course, the court might rule that such an informal arrangement, as opposed to a prescription for drugs that cause death, does violate public policy.) [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
In some combinations, these combined reporting rules—known as Joyce and Finnigan rules—can yield double taxation, while in others they can leave some income still untaxed. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:22 pm
  Respectfully, Judge Isicoff's ruling is not the law in the 7th Circuit, however, so be sure to check your local practice first. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:05 am by Erin McCarthy Holliday
A US District Judge in Montana ruled [order, PDF] Wednesday that the US State Department must conduct a more thorough environmental review of the Keystone XL pipeline project, ordering the $8 billion project’s construction to come to an immediate halt. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:54 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Maine and Montana have passed legislation to establish the same policy. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
Supreme Court (despite the Montana court’s additional due process ruling) was the Sixth Amendment issue. [read post]