Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF WHITTINGTON"
Results 1 - 20
of 233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
“A university, except in the most exceptional cases, should not be giving in to threats of violence in order to suppress speakers,” said Keith Whittington, a political scientist at Princeton University and author of “Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:31 pm
Sec. 1(b)(3) prohibits subjecting students to political views in teaching unrelated to subject matter of class. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Supreme Court eventually recognized First Amendment protections for government employees, including state university professors, who express themselves about matters of public concern. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:28 am
But individual members of the faculty also have the freedom to remain silent on matters of controversy and to choose their own time and manner of expressing their political views. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation (Amy Gutmann ed., 2018). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm
Moreover, she and Stanford's president announced that they believe the university should "generally refrain from taking institutional positions on complex political or global matters that extend beyond our immediate purview. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
Whether the judges should do this, or should publicly announce that they are doing this, is a matter I leave to others. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:03 pm
Please avoid extended background sections reciting familiar Supreme Court precedents or other well-known matters. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:50 am
If a work is relevant to the subject matter of the class, it does not matter whether others regard it as offensive or wrong. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:57 am
Porter is a relatively rare case on "intramural speech," internal faculty speech about matters of university governance and policy, and the decision is an important one in concluding that such speech does not merit constitutional protection. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Whittington and John Tomasi, eds. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:38 am
Again from the letter: The Academic Freedom Alliance stands firmly behind Professor Alonzo in this matter. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:30 am
I am utterly delighted to have three old-friends (and intellectual influences), Jack Balkin, Keith Whittington, and Kim Lane Scheppele, as the presenters of their own views about the problem. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:30 am
No matter how dysfunctional the constitutional system might seem, the political costs of simply stepping outside of that system have been high. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Randy Barnett and Keith Whittington have pla [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:30 am
description of subject matter of each lecture). [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:03 am
As Keith Whittington explains, it’s covered there as well. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 5:29 am
I noted at the time that the details would matter, but that there was cause for concern. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:20 pm
" For several of these proposals, the details will matter—a lot. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Section 3.1.2 of the Handbook guarantees that "all faculty members are entitled to freedom in the classroom in discussing their subject, but they should be careful not to introduce into their teaching controversial matter which has no relation to their subject. [read post]
