Search for: "IN. SCH. DIST. NO. I-2 v. IN. SCH. DIST. NO. I-23" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 7:36 pm by Jim Gerl
See Stepp ex rel MS v Midd West Sch Dist (JG) 65 IDELR 46 (MD Penna 2/23/15) {affirming HO decisions @112 LRP 45128 and 113 LRP 16891} Court agreed with HO that parent was not entitled to IEE at public expense because SD evaluation was appropriate.The U. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:46 pm by Ken
Dist.,240 F.3d 200, 204 (3d Cir.2001); DeAngelis v. [read post]