Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 1 - 20
of 946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 10:41 am
The serious problems with the existing draft of the Bill have been commented on before on Inforrm (here and here). [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
Inforrm had a post about the Bill last week. [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:25 am
Those sections – which apply only to claims relating to the disclosure of information concerning economic crime – were introduced at the last minute, without any consultation (see the discussion on Inforrm at the time). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Inforrm has more information here. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:34 pm
(The accuracy of the published statistics collected under CPR PD 40F is regularly questioned by Inforrm’s Blog, but they only relate to INDOs, not privacy or anonymity orders under CPR r 39.) [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
Inforrm had an article explaining the decision, available here. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:25 am
Mark Thomson, Senior Partner at Thomson Heath Jenkins & Associates and co-founder of Inforrm. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm
The Inforrm Blog’s fourteenth birthday was on 22 January 2023. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
If you would like to read a summary of the judgment you can read my previous post for Inforrm here: Myth 1: “This judgment means it’s true Lawrence Fox is a racist” The judgment didn’t decide this. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Inforrm, the Guardian cover the judgment and Seymour’s response to the ruling can be read here. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm
Inforrm had a post about the case. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
There was an Inforrm case comment. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Happy New Year to all Inforrm readers! [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
There was an Inforrm piece on the case. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
Inforrm and Hacked Off have more information. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In his judgment in Davidoff v Google LLC ([2023] EWHC 1958 (KB)) Nicklin J has comprehensively restated the principles to be applied on Norwich Pharmacal applications, emphasising the importance of balancing the Convention rights of the applicant and those of the alleged wrongdoer. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm
In the case of Bild GmbH v Germany [2023] ECHR 851 the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights found that an order that a publisher should cease publication of CCTV footage of an arrest without pixelating the face of one of the officers involved was a violation of Article 10 as it could lead to an unacceptable ban on future publication on matters of public interest. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The Press Gazette, Inforrm, Hacked Off, Reuters, The Guardian and Sky News are some of the many to cover the ruling. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:11 pm
There was an Inforrm post about this. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
Inforrm has a summary of the case law here. [read post]
