Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 21 - 40
of 885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm
The Inforrm Blog’s fourteenth birthday was on 22 January 2023. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
If you would like to read a summary of the judgment you can read my previous post for Inforrm here: Myth 1: “This judgment means it’s true Lawrence Fox is a racist” The judgment didn’t decide this. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Inforrm, the Guardian cover the judgment and Seymour’s response to the ruling can be read here. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm
Inforrm had a post about the case. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
There was an Inforrm case comment. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Happy New Year to all Inforrm readers! [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
There was an Inforrm piece on the case. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
Inforrm and Hacked Off have more information. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In his judgment in Davidoff v Google LLC ([2023] EWHC 1958 (KB)) Nicklin J has comprehensively restated the principles to be applied on Norwich Pharmacal applications, emphasising the importance of balancing the Convention rights of the applicant and those of the alleged wrongdoer. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm
In the case of Bild GmbH v Germany [2023] ECHR 851 the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights found that an order that a publisher should cease publication of CCTV footage of an arrest without pixelating the face of one of the officers involved was a violation of Article 10 as it could lead to an unacceptable ban on future publication on matters of public interest. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The Press Gazette, Inforrm, Hacked Off, Reuters, The Guardian and Sky News are some of the many to cover the ruling. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:11 pm
There was an Inforrm post about this. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
Inforrm has a summary of the case law here. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
Similarly, in Secretary of State for the Home Department v TLU [2018] 4 WLR 101, [2018] EWCA Civ 2217 (15 June 2018) [h/t Inforrm] Gross LJ held that, for the purposes of common law and data protection claims, the wife and child of a person whose data had been inadvertently published were also identifiable, even though they had a different surname, and their relationship could only be derived from extraneous data ([31], [39]). [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Inforrm has a summary of the new legal framework here. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
Inforrm’s Blog features the article, originally published by The Conversation, that argues “trusted flaggers” can reduce the proliferation of harmful content on social media. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
Reuters, Inforrm and the Press Gazette have more information. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
We had an Inforrm case comment on the decision. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
Inforrm posted commentary on the story here and here. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Inforrm has a summary here. [read post]
