Search for: "INFORRM" Results 41 - 60 of 332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2014, 9:31 am by INFORRM
 There is a special discount of 50% available to Inforrm readers, details of which are set out below. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:22 pm by Charon QC
Thompson Inforrm’s Blog adds to the Christmas cheer with a list of 105 legal tweeters who can be followed…. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There’s still time to enter the Inforrm Media Law Quiz of the Year - just. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 1:56 am by INFORRM
Please let Inforrm know: [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
INFORRM had a Practice Note on these key procedural changes. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
Inforrm’s report can be found here. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
As Inforrm noted here, in a post examining the detail of the Amendments, there were 16 Lords Amendments. [read post]
30 May 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
There are, at present, two open Government consultations of particular interest to readers of Inforrm. [read post]
12 Dec 2012, 6:19 am by INFORRM
In a recent post on Inforrm it was suggested that the recent notorious prank phone call from two Australian DJs to the King Edward VII Hospital where they blagged private information about the Duchess of Cambridge and which had such tragic consequences, constituted an offence under section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (the “DPA”). [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
We had an Inforrm case comment by Zoe McCullum. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
In response, Inforrm asked: Does the Act “reverse the chilling effect on freedom of expression of current libel law” or is it damp squib which will make defamation cases more complex? [read post]
26 May 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
  Inforrm is, therefore, taking a “mini-break” but this round up will cover some of the news of the past week. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
There was an Inforrm case comment and a post on the Panopticon blog. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:55 am by INFORRM
In his piece on Inforrm yesterday, Keith Mathieson begins by describing the use of CFAs in cases against the media as a “scandal”. [read post]