Search for: "INTERN. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
The Telecommunication Bill covers many aspects of regulation, from the licensing regime for telecom and internet service providers to state powers of interception and surveillance. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
On 17 October 2016, the investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) delivered its judgment in the case Privacy International v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 am
Martinez sentenced Jean Rene Duperval, the former director of international relations for Telecommunications D’Haiti S.A.M. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
For example in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:19 pm
Kidane, who is suing the Ethiopian government for covertly installing spyware on his computer in the United States, surveilling his Skype conversations and Google searches), detailed descriptions and screenshots of internal Ethiopian Telecommunications wiretapping software, and testimony from Ethiopia’s own whistleblowers from within their security service, the report paints a picture of a regime just beginning to flex its digital surveillance muscles. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
Wallace, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Special Agent.U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See also United Mexican States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 am
Julius Stobbs and Katherine ThompsonIn a recent decision (Cartier International AGand others (Respondents) v British Telecommunications Plc and another(Appellants) [2018] UKSC 28), the UK Supreme Court has ruled that brand owners must pay Internet Service Providers’ (ISPs) costs for implementing website blocking injunctions. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:37 pm
Category: Civil Procedure By: Christian Hannon, Contributor TitleK-Tech Telecommunications, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Section 889 prohibits the federal government from directly procuring “any equipment, system or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as a part of any system” or entering into a contract with any entity that uses such covered telecommunications equipment or services. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:46 pm
Cress, 112 Ohio St.3d 72, 2006-Ohio-6501, ¶ 36, quoting Webster's Third New International Dictionary 2382 (1986) citing State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict… [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:19 am
There are more and more firsts in the Ericsson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:15 am
Sisvel International S.A. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Section 889 of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), passed by Congress and signed by President Trump, mandates: (a) The head of an executive agency may not— (A) procure or obtain or extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system; or (B) enter into a… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 am
The seminal case Younger v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:04 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:07 am
The NetherlandsVan Haga v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:17 pm
The patented system collects these raw us- age data records from their diffuse locations AMDOCS LIMITED v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 12:44 pm
Sisvel International S.A. v. [read post]
