Search for: "INTERN. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2021, 7:23 am
Authoritarians and kleptocrats have become adept at exploiting the gaps in underregulated and obscure corners of the international fora underpinning the open international system. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:49 am
By Dennis Crouch Cisco Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:01 pm
Apple v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:09 pm
Identify Data Transfer MechanismsOrganizations should identify the data transfer mechanism relied on under Chapter V of the GDPR, if necessary. [read post]
A New Milestone: Appeals Court to Consider NSA's Mass Seizures and Searches on the Internet Backbone
4 Aug 2015, 3:10 pm
Today, in our landmark case Jewel v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The asymmetries run beyond the usual problem of state subsidies to that of states being tempted to tilt markets in favor of SOEs (producing a sort of systemic corruption in markets driven systems) to issues of interference with sovereignty when SOEs serve as the apex enterprise in global production chains.[18] The legal status of SOEs varies from being a part of government to stock companies with a state as a regular stockholder.[19] But its purpose has… [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:15 pm
In our case, Alasaad v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 8:21 pm
European telecommunications companies and Privacy International have disclosed that direct access is employed by a range of states beyond the Eurasia region. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:19 am
The Court’s decision in National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
From their website: “The collections include individuals' papers and companies' records ranging from eighteenth-century merchants to modern telecommunications and illustrate the impact of the business system on society. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Use of a mark in a company name results in a finding of “instrument of fraud”, just like for domain namesBayerische Motoren Werke v BMW Telecommunications Limited, Benjamin Michael Whitehouse [2019] EWHC 411 (IPEC) (February 2019)Benjamin Michael Whitehouse has the initials BMW. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:23 am
Second, the Paris Court sets forth that an anti-suit injunction by an EU member state against the courts of another member state would be contrary to public policy (ordre public), because of the "mutual trust in the judicial systems of EU member states" (see CJEU C-159/02 – Turner/Grovit). [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
They also require approval by the secretary of state and authorize the “bulk interception” of “external communications in the course of their transmission by means of a telecommunication system” if it is deemed necessary for one of the aforementioned Section 5 justifications. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:06 pm
At the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) Nokia has just defeated Google and HTC with respect to the proper legal interpretation of U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
This includes when regulating Canada’s communication system and enforcing the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules, CASL, the National Do Not Call List (DNCL) and the VCR. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:35 pm
Ericsson mmWave trial: Apple dropped one of its three patents-in-suit right before trialFor the same day--yesterday--the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) had scheduled the trial of Apple's countersuit against Ericsson. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
