Search for: "INTERSTATE INVESTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Race to the Bottom
If Bitqyck used “any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce for the purpose of using a facility of an exchange within or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to effect one or more transactions in a security,” it could be held liable for hosting an unregistered exchange. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:29 am by John Stigi
Mar. 27, 2019), the Supreme Court of the United States (Breyer, J.) held that an individual who did not “make” a false or misleading statement within the meaning of Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Co-director of enforcement Stephanie Avakian touted the Cyber Unit’s second ICO enforcement action, stating: “We will continue to scrutinize the ICO market vigilantly for improper offerings that seek to sell securities to the general public without the required registration or exemption. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
”  [14][1]          United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm by Law Lady
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING THROUGH FARM SERVICE AGENCY, f/k/a FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Appellee. 1st District.Attorney Disqualification: BOFA SEEKS TO OUST AIG LAW FIRM FROM $10 BILLION CASE, AIG v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]