Search for: "ITI Marketing, Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2022, 2:44 pm
" And in Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 1:24 pm
Apotex, Inc., 550 F.3d 1075, 1086 (Fed. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm
John Wiley &Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
And, because a lesser degree of similarity is required when a trademark holder’s mark is strong, the commercial strength of the “POM” mark amplifies the significance of the marks’ many similarities See Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506F.3d 1165, 1174 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[T]he fact that the similarity involves the use of a much stronger mark would make that similarity weigh more heavily in the analysis of this factor. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:19 am
Honest Tea, Inc., 2014 WL 2593601, No. 2:13-cv-02318 (E.D. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
Chef Am., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:20 pm
Id. at 1379; ABB Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:44 am
In the past week, for instance, an 8-K filed by KBR, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:49 am
Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:23 pm
These transfers will unfreeze commodity positions with a notional value of $100 billion and represent a substantial position of all existing commod- ity accounts at MF Global Inc. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
See Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:01 am
Inspired Technologies, Inc. (2011 U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:37 am
Indeed, the statute was enacted to overrule cases such as Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v Prodigy Services Co.,1995 WL 323710 (Nassau Sup. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Neil Skekhter; NMS Properties, Inc.; 15394 NM, LLC; and NMS/JSM San Lorenzo, LLC. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
As we saw above, corporate law gives considerable responsibility and latitude to target directors in negotiating a merger agreement. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
Presumably, the plaintiffs deliberately chose to avoid rule-of-reason claims (in which the plaintiff is required to demonstrate, e.g., the defendant's market power in a defined market) and the allegation of "bilateral or single-entity enterprises" to preserve their class action status against all defendants. [read post]
29 May 2010, 2:15 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:12 am
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:29 am
ITI argued that these telephone conversations established that a controversy existed with respect to patent infringement by the devices that ITI intended to market. [read post]
