Search for: "Ice v. Com." Results 81 - 97 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2009, 3:32 am
Ice implicitly overruled State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:30 am
  In State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Ice - In a decision that could have major implications for Ohio sentencing law, Court holds that Blakely does not prohibit judicial fact-finding for imposition of consecutive sentences. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Ice abrogates State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:52 am
Closer to home, in Lima v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:45 am
  Back in 2006, in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:59 am
Ice to consecutive sentencing in Ohio. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 3:47 am
US and Oregon v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Three years ago, in State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
Ice, which I’ll discuss tomorrow. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 3:21 pm
  That means investors will not be able to recover any money from the advisors to corporate frauds that melt their investments like ice cream in August on a Dallas sidewalk.The case, Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]