Search for: "Ide v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 11,818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
Article 7 urges a signatory state to prohibit the importation of illicitly transferred cultural property from another state while Article 9 allows a state whose cultural property is in jeopardy to request assistance from other states.[4] CPIA allows foreign states to enter into bilateral agreements (or Memorandum of Understanding) with the U.S., which entails an import restriction on cultural property of certain types and from certain periods. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
Cost Principles Coverage of Direct and Indirect Costs A “direct cost” is any cost that is identified specifically with a particular final cost objective.[1] A “cost objective” is a function, organizational subdivision, contract, or other work unit for which the contractor accumulates and measures costs.[2] A “final cost objective” is a cost objective that receives an allocation of both direct and indirect costs and that is one of the final accumulation… [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:25 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  FDA found that marijuana continued to have a high potential for abuse, lacked accepted safety for use under medical supervision and had no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]