Search for: "Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois"
Results 41 - 60
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Concord EFS, Inc. 13-63Issue: Whether a plaintiff who purchases directly from a member of a price-fixing conspiracy is necessarily a “direct purchaser” under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:45 am
The Supreme Court concluded in Leegin that such agreements should be evaluated under the rule of reason; and (2) section 905(d) allows damages for indirect purchasers, which are barred in federal antitrust law under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 10:34 am
Even though plaintiffs purchased programming from MVPDs and not directly from the Leagues or the teams, she held that plaintiffs did not lack standing under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 10:36 am
The argument now before the trial court turns in part on how to apply a 35 year-old Supreme Court decision, Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
This is clearly demonstrated by the bibliography of the PhD thesis of Wayne Westerman, co-founder of FingerWorks, a company that Apple acquired early in 2005, and now an Apple employee In making this statement about their awareness of past work, I am not criticizing Westerman, the iPhone, or Apple. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:52 am
By Dylan Ballard and Nadezhda Nikonova The Ninth Circuit unanimously affirmed a grant of summary judgment for defendants in an antitrust suit involving alleged price-fixing of ATM fees, holding that the plaintiffs were indirect purchasers within the meaning of Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 4:36 pm
Another potential barrier to many civil claims is the bar on claims by “indirect purchasers” under the Supreme Court case Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
., et al. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
As the Illinois Supreme Court elucidated in Dardeen v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:59 am
The plaintiff sought to invoke the ownership or control exception to Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:10 pm
Supreme Court's landmark 1977 decision, Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
Ford Motor Co.), or rollover-prone all-terrain vehicles (like Smith v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 4:03 pm
Illinois Brick Layers Inc., 08 L 4113. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:10 pm
The case law is Quill Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
" Boys Markets v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
In Illinois Brick v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
The District Court dismissed plaintiffs’ claims under the rule of Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:58 pm
As a result of this alleged “price fix,” interchange fees are, Plaintiffs maintain, higher than they would otherwise be.Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
I've discussed the problems with the Illinois Brick decision before. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
Highlights this week included: Lego brick cannot be registered as a trade mark, rules ECJ: Lego Juris v. [read post]