Search for: "Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Concord EFS, Inc. 13-63Issue: Whether a plaintiff who purchases directly from a member of a price-fixing conspiracy is necessarily a “direct purchaser” under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:45 am by Christine Nielsen
The Supreme Court concluded in Leegin that such agreements should be evaluated under the rule of reason; and (2) section 905(d) allows damages for indirect purchasers, which are barred in federal antitrust law under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 10:34 am by Sheppard Mullin
Even though plaintiffs purchased programming from MVPDs and not directly from the Leagues or the teams, she held that plaintiffs did not lack standing under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 10:36 am by Jeffrey Gross
The argument now before the trial court turns in part on how to apply a 35 year-old Supreme Court decision, Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  This is clearly demonstrated by the bibliography of the PhD thesis of Wayne Westerman, co-founder of FingerWorks, a company that Apple acquired early in 2005, and now an Apple employee In making this statement about their awareness of past work, I am not criticizing Westerman, the iPhone, or Apple. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Dylan Ballard and Nadezhda Nikonova  The Ninth Circuit unanimously affirmed a grant of summary judgment for defendants in an antitrust suit involving alleged price-fixing of ATM fees, holding that the plaintiffs were indirect purchasers within the meaning of Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 4:36 pm by Jeffrey Gross
Another potential barrier to many civil claims is the bar on claims by  “indirect purchasers” under the Supreme Court case  Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:59 am
The plaintiff sought to invoke the ownership or control exception to Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:10 pm by Dan Bushell
Supreme Court's landmark 1977 decision, Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Antitrust Today
  The District Court dismissed plaintiffs’ claims under the rule of Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:58 pm by Mike
As a result of this alleged “price fix,” interchange fees are, Plaintiffs maintain, higher than they would otherwise be.Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Highlights this week included: Lego brick cannot be registered as a trade mark, rules ECJ: Lego Juris v. [read post]