Search for: "Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois" Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Ninth Inning, Inc., 19-1098Issues: (1) Whether an agreement among the members of a joint venture on how best to distribute the venture’s jointly created core product may be condemned under the Sherman Act without requiring the plaintiff to establish that defendants harmed competition in a properly defined antitrust market; and (2) whether, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
  As a result, the class of retail purchasers were "indirect purchasers" and so were precluded from bringing that claim under the Supreme Court's decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Concord EFS, Inc. 13-63Issue: Whether a plaintiff who purchases directly from a member of a price-fixing conspiracy is necessarily a “direct purchaser” under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
The Vioxx VerdictsThe legal community is still abuzz about the $253 million verdict against Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Had he lived, he might have co-authored the absurd NASCAR substance abuse policy. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Had he lived, he might have co-authored the absurd NASCAR substance abuse policy. [read post]