Search for: "Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois" Results 61 - 77 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2009, 5:26 am
Indirect purchasers can't make claims under the federal antitrust laws after the Supreme Court's seminal decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 3:34 am
Today's ruling extended the Illinois Brick rule -- which gets its name from Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
Blawgletter found the issue interesting -- so much so that we co-wrote an amicus brief pro bono for the States of Connecticut, Arizona, Illinois, Montana, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Tennessee. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
DVSS brought a motion in the district court to dismiss Bamberg's claims on the grounds that, because Bamberg did not obtain its products directly from J & J, it lacked standing to pursue antitrust claims based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
DVSS brought a motion in the district court to dismiss Bamberg's claims on the grounds that, because Bamberg did not obtain its products directly from J & J, it lacked standing to pursue antitrust claims based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 3:02 am
Apr. 30, 2008), the court considered the question of who qualifies as a "direct purchaser" of products under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
  As a result, the class of retail purchasers were "indirect purchasers" and so were precluded from bringing that claim under the Supreme Court's decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:02 pm
  Defendants claim that plaintiffs' damages experts failed to distinguish between transactions in which plaintiffs were "first purchasers" of copper and indirect purchases by plaintiffs that cannot provide a basis for recovery under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 8:06 am
 The Court analogized Paycom's position to that of the indirect purchaser plaintiffs in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
The Vioxx VerdictsThe legal community is still abuzz about the $253 million verdict against Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]