Search for: "Illinois v. Wardlow" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am by Brian Shiffrin
In Illinois v Wardlow (528 US 119 [2000]), the United States Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, held that a person in a high crime area fleeing at the sight of police is, by itself, sufficient to create reasonable suspicion, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:09 am by Peggy Cross-Goldenberg
” Their article, The End of Intuition-Based High-Crime Areas, which you can access here, presents the first empirical analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:45 am by Kiera Flynn
Fowler Docket: 10-1273 Issue: Does the Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am by David Markus
S. 1, 4–5 (1989), and how you behaved, Illinois v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 11:49 am by Andrew Tidwell-Neal
A late night encounter in a high crime area requires very few "specific articulable" facts to warrant a Terry stop and frisk.In Illinois v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:16 am
First, the officer testified that the stop occurred in a high-crime area, which is relevant under Illinois v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 6:29 am
Our Florida Supreme Court reluctantly followed a United States Supreme Court decision in Illinois v. [read post]