Search for: "Imbler v. Pachtman" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2019, 6:36 am by Aurora Barnes
Pachtman; and whether Martinez v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 6:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
That objection would be misplaced, because the same principles that the Court invokes in Imbler are also invoked in cases more clearly grounded in Article II, especially Nixon v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:44 am
In February 2006, Livesay and Van de Kamp sought to dismiss the complaint under the Court's decision in Imbler v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm by Will Baude
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 421 (1976), unless the statute provides some reason to think that Congress did not preserve the defense, see Tower v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:01 am by Monroe Freedman
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), and that “occur[s] in the course of his role as an advocate for the State,” Buckley v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by admin
” In the 1976 Supreme Court case, Imbler v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
So do prosecutors, when they are prosecuting: Imbler v. [read post]