Search for: "Imbler v. Pachtman"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2019, 6:36 am
Pachtman; and whether Martinez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:39 am
The Supreme Court, in Imbler v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:00 am
Pachtman. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 9:05 pm
Smith confirms the Supreme Court's holding in Imbler v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 8:06 pm
Pachtman; Buckley v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:44 am
In February 2006, Livesay and Van de Kamp sought to dismiss the complaint under the Court's decision in Imbler v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 9:28 am
Pachtman and its progeny; and (2) whether the absolute immunity that applies to prosecutors for conduct under the “functional approach” embraced in Imbler extends to law enforcement officers performing the same conduct while assisting in the prosecution of the criminal charge. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:16 am
See Imbler v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 7:28 am
Imbler v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:01 am
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), and that “occur[s] in the course of his role as an advocate for the State,” Buckley v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 421 (1976), unless the statute provides some reason to think that Congress did not preserve the defense, see Tower v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:03 am
" Imbler v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:42 am
” Imbler v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:49 am
In Imbler v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:54 am
Imbler v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
So do prosecutors, when they are prosecuting: Imbler v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 12:22 pm
In Imbler v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:50 pm
Pachtman. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
See, e.g., Imbler v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:27 am
Pachtman. [read post]
