Search for: "Impax Laboratories, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2021, 5:15 am by Dennis Crouch
(functional trade dress); Impax Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:49 pm by Gene Quinn
The FTC’s complaint alleges that Endo engaged in a pay for delay scheme by paying the first generic companies that filed for FDA approval – Impax Laboratories, Inc. and Watson Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 2:32 pm by Robert Reznick
  The FTC’s complaint attacks two such settlements that Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and the Japan-based patent holder for one of the relevant patents reached with generic manufacturers Watson Laboratories (and Watson’s current owner, Allergan plc) and Impax Laboratories, to settle Hatch-Waxman litigation involving Endo’s two most important products—the pain relievers Opana ER® and Lidoderm®.[2]  The FTC’s complaint,… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
Given the compression of competition due to the agreement, the FTC caught wind of the Shire-Barr-Impax agreement and opened an investigation in October 2006: “The US Federal Trade Commission (‘FTC’) informed Shire on October 3, 2006 that it was reviewing the ADDERALL XR patent litigation settlement agreement between Shire and Barr Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
Given the compression of competition due to the agreement, the FTC caught wind of the Shire-Barr-Impax agreement and opened an investigation in October 2006: “The US Federal Trade Commission (‘FTC’) informed Shire on October 3, 2006 that it was reviewing the ADDERALL XR patent litigation settlement agreement between Shire and Barr Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:49 pm
victories in fight for European BRCA patents (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) Europe: European Commission proposes strategy for dealing with rare diseases (Pharmacapsules @ Gowlings) US: Former House Ways and Means Economist claims 7-year data exclusive period is sufficient (Patent Docs) US: Medco predicts follow-on biologics regulatory pathway by 2011 (Patent Docs) US: Even after patent has expired, District Court has jurisdiction to set exclusivity date: In re Omeprazole Patent Litigation… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its… [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to… [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
– Removal of diplomatic immunity and alleged smear campaign: (IPKat)    Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Working Group for the Legal Development of the Madrid System proposes replacement of ‘tacit acceptance’ regime: (Class 46), Global branding for a family-owned cult wine: can it be done? [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
– ownership of IP: (Dilanchian), Consultant or contractor IP: (Dilanchian), IP and general business law issues: Website terms of use reduce risk: (Dilanchian), Plant breeder’s rights actions in the Federal Court will now be regarded as IP cases for the purpose of docket allocation: (IPwar’s), Ajinomoto v NutraSweet – inventive step and costs: (IPRoo), Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft 2020 submission:… [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael… [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPKat),Amazon gift ordering patent revoked by the EPO: (OUT-LAW), (IP Law360)Legal protection for databases: case report on dispute between the British Horseracing Board and William Hill: (OUT-LAW),Court of First Instance rejects Enercon's appeal to register a football-shaped wind turbine as a Community trade mark: (Mondaq.com),More on registrability of Tarzan's yell as a trade mark at OHIM: (OUT-LAW), (more from OUT-LAW),Gateway… [read post]