Search for: "In Interest of DM"
Results 41 - 60
of 324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 6:13 pm
Interested stakeholders may also provide input at the FDA/PQRI Workshop on the Regulatory Framework for Distributed and Point of Care Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: An Opportunity for DM/POC Stakeholder Engagement on November 14-16, 2022. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 8:51 am
The answer is yes, but only when a TikTok lawyer understands the kinds of content that create interest there. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:47 pm
Those interested in joining should DM or email Alejandro Chehtman (Twitter: @achehtman1). [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:56 am
The judge will consider each case individually and can order disclosure of the information if "the public interest served by disclosure of employment history information clearly outweighs the public interest served by not disclosing the information. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:13 am
A lot of people say they have had liver complication and have had their gallbladders removed. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:46 am
Do we really think the law clerks are sliding into Josh Gerstein's Instagram DMs? [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:58 am
Not long after the post went up, we received a DM from one of our followers; “Malevich’s Wikipedia page says he’s Russian,” it read. [read post]
9 May 2022, 11:56 am
Note: I have sent Twitter DMs to both Gawker and the reporter directly with this information. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:40 pm
Twitter direct messages (or DMs) contain some of the most sensitive user data on the platform. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 7:27 pm
This is the latest entry in my lengthy archive of writing, talks, and interviews about the EARN IT Act: Blog posts here at the CIS blog: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5, part 6, part 7, part 8, part 9 Articles for Brookings TechStream: part 1, part 2 Talks at the DEFCON Crypto & Privacy Village and the University of Waterloo Interviews on the Techdirt podcast (July 2020, February 2022), Decipher Security Podcast, and ExpressVPN blog A month ago, the controversial EARN IT Act sailed… [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
We need your vote! [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
We need your vote! [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 9:28 am
Today, if you want to leave Facebook, you need to leave your social connections behind as well: that means no more DMs from your friend, no more access to your sibling’s photos, and no more event invitations from your co-workers. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 3:11 pm
Self-selected groups tend to share something — if not a set of well understood norms and expectations, at least a common interest or purpose. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:56 pm
HOW TO APPLY: Submit a note to applications@lawfareblog.com with the subject line <DMS: your name> containing a single document with (1) a cover letter of no more than two pages; (2) a resume that shows the experience and education requested above; and (3) 3-5 current professional references with, at least, email addresses. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 5:50 am
While technology is part of innovation, technology alone is not innovation. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm
The only exception, Salmonella Dublin, was added to Petitioners’ list because it is a serotype of increasing public health concern that was recently involved in a foodborne illness outbreak linked to ground beef. [2] In addition to 5 USC § 553(e)’s requirement that each agency “shall give an interested person the right to petition for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule,” the Administrative… [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:15 pm
The only exception, Salmonella Dublin, was added to Petitioners’ list because it is a serotype of increasing public health concern that was recently involved in a foodborne illness outbreak linked to ground beef. [2] In addition to 5 USC § 553(e)’s requirement that each agency “shall give an interested person the right to petition for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule,” the Administrative… [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
It has been quite a journey for the document management company iManage. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 5:09 pm
[ASU loses, even though the defendant “stopped participating in this action after his answer was stricken” “for litigation misconduct”: “[A]a reasonably prudent consumer would not be deceived or confused into believing that ASU was the ‘source or origin’ of the posts and messages emanating from the ‘asu_covid.parties. [read post]