Search for: "In Interest of Gonzales" Results 1 - 20 of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 7:01 am by Wells Bennett
Here are two quite recent papers, both of obvious interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
Newsweek has an interesting story reporting that Alberto Gonzales has hired attorney George Terwillger -- who had been on the short-list to replace Gonzales as AG -- to help Gonzales... [read post]
3 May 2007, 9:05 am
Two interesting op-eds in today's New York Times offer ways to deal with the troubling persistence of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:01 am
Alberto Gonzales hasn't had a full-time job since his resignation. [read post]
5 May 2007, 5:47 pm
Although there is language in Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Nov 2004, 3:32 am
[JURIST] The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has released a report on US Attorney General nominee Alberto Gonzales concluding that while he recognizes First Amendment interests in newsgathering and reporting, his record as a Texas Supreme Court judge and as White House counsel advising the President on such matters as Presidential papers, the Cheney energy task force and proceedings [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
Guerra alleges that Alberto Gonzales intervened to stop an investigation into a private prison firm operating the local jail, a business in which the Vice President has personal investments:He is most interested in "cutting the head off the snake - which is cutting off what Gonzales and Cheney are doing," Guerra told The Brownsville Herald on Wednesday. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 9:04 am
Over at the Legalities blog, Jan Crawford Greenburg has a very interesting post on Gonzales v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 11:52 pm
Three interesting articles related to the US Attorney happenings - 1. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
The actual interest the Court is asserting is not the interest in protecting potential life but rather an interest in not having the life of fetuses ended in ways that the legislature regards as particularly gruesome. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 10:50 am
It is merely a default rule that can be waived in the interests of national security according to the judgment of the President as Commander-in-Chief. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
” “Finally, if you’re interested in co-sponsoring an event with us in the future, please let us know; we would be delighted to work with you. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 7:27 am
( Not to mention that the same questions must be asked about Gonzales’s boss.) [read post]
7 May 2007, 11:41 am
Adil Ahmad Haque has posted some interesting commentary here and here on PrawfsBlawg on the relationship between Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 9:09 pm
Both Larry Lessig and Jack Balkin have very interesting posts on Golan v. [read post]