Search for: "In Interest of SJC" Results 1 - 20 of 425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Robert Ambrogi
Such an order may be upheld only if it is the least restrictive, reasonable measure necessary to protect a compelling governmental interest. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
"SJC justice recalled for her interest in people and piano": This article appears today in The Boston Globe. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am by Keith L. Miller
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) recently held that the simultaneous representation of business competitors by attorneys in different offices of the same law firm does not constitute a per se conflict of interest. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am by Keith L. Miller
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) recently held that the simultaneous representation of business competitors by attorneys in different offices of the same law firm does not constitute a per se conflict of interest. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am by Keith L. Miller
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) recently held that the simultaneous representation of business competitors by attorneys in different offices of the same law firm does not constitute a per se conflict of interest. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm by Meg
The SJC announced yesterday that SJC Rule 1:19, originally slated to become effective July 1, will not take effect until September 17, 2012. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 8:59 am by Rich Vetstein
MERS (SJC DAR 20960) The SJC just accepted direct appellate review from the Appeals Court in this interesting case. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:14 am by Brian E. Barreira
In this case, the MassHealth applicant had a life estate listed on the nominee trust’s Schedule of Beneficiaries, and her children owned vested remainder interests. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:28 am by Seth Jaffe
Unfortunately, the problems with the SJC’s jurisprudence stem from the statute itself and not simply from prior SJC or Appeals Court decisions. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm by Robert Ambrogi
Key provisions of the new rule, as outlined in an SJC announcement today, include: The news media are defined as those who are regularly engaged in the reporting and publishing of news or information about matters of public interest. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:01 pm by Heidi A. Nadel
The SJC pulled the case upOnce Chadwick docketed her appeal in the Appeals Court, the SJC sua sponte took the matter up, and solicited amicus briefs on the issue of "Whether Massachusetts will recognize a union-member testimonial privilege, such that the plaintiff in this case, in her underlying employment discrimination action against her employer, would not be required to produce in discovery communications between herself and her union representatives related to her case. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:01 pm by Heidi A. Nadel
The SJC pulled the case upOnce Chadwick docketed her appeal in the Appeals Court, the SJC sua sponte took the matter up, and solicited amicus briefs on the issue of "Whether Massachusetts will recognize a union-member testimonial privilege, such that the plaintiff in this case, in her underlying employment discrimination action against her employer, would not be required to produce in discovery communications between herself and her union representatives related to her case. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 12:09 pm by Daniel Cappetta
” In conducting such a review, the judge “may consider whether dismissal of the complaint is in the best interests of the child and in the interests of justice. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:01 pm by Heidi A. Nadel
Duxbury Public Schools et al, SJC-12054, andwill be poised to decidewhether the Commonwealth recognizes a union-member testimonial privilege that protects communications between a union member and his or her union representative made in the course of a grievance procedure.For unions, union members, and labor and employment lawyers on both sides, the issue raised is significant. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 2:07 am by Michael DelSignore
PBS.org has an interesting article about DNA testing used in court, which sheds some more light on issues like this. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 5:28 am by Rich Vetstein
So we’ll have to thank the SJC and the Legislature for sticking it to Massachusetts landlords once again. [read post]