Search for: "In Matter of SS"
Results 1 - 20
of 713
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2018, 2:20 am
On appeal from: [2017] NICA 42 This appeal considered whether the Offences against the Person Act 1861, ss 58 and 59 and the Criminal Justice Act (NI) 1945, s 25 are incompatible with the ECHR, arts 3, 8 and 14 in failing to provide an exception to the prohibition on the termination of pregnancy in Northern Ireland in cases of serious malformation of the unborn child/foetus or pregnancy as a result of rape or incest. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:00 am
It felt “substantial justice” would be accomplished by allowing the matter to proceed to trial and having a hearing on the merits (and that is when SS’s “substantive arguments for dismissal” may be raised).As a result, the Civil Court’s denial of the defendant’s dismissal motion was affirmed.Think they were a bit too dismissive (of dismissals) there? [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:31 pm
Some relationships, such as attorney and client or parent and child, are deemed confidential as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 11:57 am
Learn about: Why this matters How to recognize Control Factors Benefits of Voluntary Compliance How the Form SS-8 can help [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
It noted the “fundamental reason” for applying the “manifestly without reasonable foundation” test as given by the ECtHR Grand Chamber in Stec: that “[c]hoices about welfare systems involve policy decisions on economic and social matters which are pre-eminently matters for national authorities” (at [32]). [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:25 pm
I mean, he is absolutely right but none of the SS would admit to the fact that they are just bored like-minded liberals scared to death that finances matter. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
# # #Matter of Alexandra U. v Shalva S. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 9:31 pm
Herfried Wöss (Wöss & Partners, S.C.), Adriana San Román Rivera (Wöss & Partners, S.C.), Pablo Spiller (Univ. of California, Berkeley - Business), & Santiago Dellepiane (Compass Lexicon) have published Damages in International Arbitration under Complex Long-term Contracts (Oxford Univ. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Digital Satellites Warranty Cover Limited (DSWCL) and Satellite Services (SS) (the Appellants) were in the business of selling extended warranties to satellite television customers. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:08 am
Now, do I have to pay tax on the money received from SS? [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:50 am
If you no longer have a copy of the SS-4 Application or remember who was named as the "responsible party," you may wish to file a Form 8822-B before March 1, 2014. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 10:32 am
Senator Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R) is the primary sponsor of SS No. 4. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:34 pm
A-06-CA-111-SS) patent infringement case accepting the Report and Recommendation of the Special Master on claim construction. [read post]
31 May 2014, 3:50 am
Two, SS Nijjar, J. held that Maestro Engineers was per incurium because it failed to take note of Section 16. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 2:16 pm
Just when the Boxee party started getting really good, Hulu had to come along and p*ss in the punchbowl. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
Regardless, he did not wish to discuss the matter. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
Regardless, he did not wish to discuss the matter. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:35 pm
As everyone will likely know, the governing provisions are ss.5 and 6 of the Supreme Court Act, which read as follows: 5. [read post]
