Search for: "In Re: Amendments of the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Under Reed, such rules are normally subject to strict scrutiny even assuming they are viewpoint-neutral. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:35 am by jamison
A professional photographer and artist once told me the story about trying to photograph his mother. [read post]