Search for: "In Re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code"
Results 21 - 40
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2010, 9:11 am
An order of the circuit court that determines a right, an obligation or the standing of an interested person as defined by the Florida Probate Code may be appealed before the administration of the probate or guardianship is complete and the fiduciary is discharged. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:01 am
I asked why you haven't been working day and night to change your campus code -- which you've just admitted currently allows this evil speech -- and you're lawyering your answer? [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 3:01 pm
The court also characterized the provisions of section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (1993) as "more stringent requirements" than section 71.011, Florida Statutes (1995).The Court explained that pursuant to section 90.953, Florida Statutes, (2002), Florida's code of evidence, the plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure must present the original promissory note as a duplicate of a note is not admissible. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:04 am
So if you’re an EAS Participant, you can modify your existing gear or not, as you wish. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Tarbert, We write about proposed amendments to Rule 4-7.13 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, relating to online keyword advertising by attorneys. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:24 am
Trial court concluded there was no evidence on record that defendant had any notice of the condition, and no basis for application of res ipsa loquitur. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:39 am
Code § 1343”. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am
Evidence Code, No. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:01 pm
The court also characterized the provisions of section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (1993) as "more stringent requirements" than section 71.011, Florida Statutes (1995).The Court explained that pursuant to section 90.953, Florida Statutes, (2002), Florida's code of evidence, the plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure must present the original promissory note as a duplicate of a note is not admissible. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
Then earlier this year, the Florida Supreme Court in the per curiam ruling of In re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code, decided NOT to adopt the Daubert standard – even though the legislature had passed a law enacting it – for two reasons: Concerns regarding the constitutionality of the amendment; Procedural concerns with the law creating a section that isn’t part of the state’s evidence… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:07 am
We put in some language that hopefully lets the bad guys know we’re looking over their shoulders. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:29 pm
Ladson (2002): The Florida Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
” In re Adoption of Holland, 965 So.2d 1213, 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (citing § 63.042(1), Fla. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
D., IN RE: THE MATTER OF TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS FOR THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF A MINOR CHILD, Appellee. 1st District. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 9:28 am
[See In re Amendments to Florida Evidence Code, 144 So.3d 536, 536–537 (Mem) (Fla.2014).] [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
For another, the followup Second Circuit case, Cliffs Notes—unlike Gordon—says you have to remember the important First Amendment interests at stake even when you’re back in multifactor test land.] [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am
Elections -- Campaign financing -- Excess spending subsidy -- Injunctions -- Candidate for Republican Party for Governor of State of Florida, who is not participating in Florida system of public campaign financing, moved to preliminarily enjoin enforcement of provision of Florida Election Campaign Financing Act, which provides participating candidates with a subsidy to spend on their campaigns when a nonparticipating opponent spends in excess of statutory expenditure limit… [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:17 am
Janes, 878 So.2d 440, 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (“The 2002 amendment to section 733.107, adding subsection 2, was intended to incorporate sections 90.301–90.304 of the Florida Evidence Code, and require a shifting of the burden of proof after the presumption of undue influence arises in a will contest. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm
The Court unanimously re-affirmed Beard‘s no-retreat rule in Alberty v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Code § 1332. [read post]
